President Droupadi Murmu has invoked the Supreme Court’s advisory jurisdiction to seek its opinion on whether binding timelines can be prescribed for the President and Governors to act on Bills passed by State Assemblies. Can this Presidential Reference prompt the court to revisit its April 8 judgment?
President Droupadi Murmu has invoked the Supreme Court’s advisory jurisdiction to seek its opinion on whether binding timelines can be prescribed for the President and Governors to act on Bills passed by State Assemblies. Can this Presidential Reference prompt the court to revisit its April 8 judgment?