Consider government employee’s plea to include live-in partner in family pension: Delhi HC to Centre

The Bench held that the petitioner never concealed his relationship, and treating his efforts to include the names of his partner and children as part of his family as “grave misconduct” to deny post-retirement benefits was erroneous

​The Bench held that the petitioner never concealed his relationship, and treating his efforts to include the names of his partner and children as part of his family as “grave misconduct” to deny post-retirement benefits was erroneous