‘Deemed consent’ usurps functions of President and Governor, and is ‘antithetical’ to the Constitution and separation of powers, says top court; however, SC opines against sitting on State Bills through “prolonged and evasive inaction”
‘Deemed consent’ usurps functions of President and Governor, and is ‘antithetical’ to the Constitution and separation of powers, says top court; however, SC opines against sitting on State Bills through “prolonged and evasive inaction”