Why did the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act bail bar prevail against Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam? Why were the two student activists on a ‘qualitatively different footing’, according to the top court? How does the verdict mark a departure from judicial precedent?
Why did the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act bail bar prevail against Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam? Why were the two student activists on a ‘qualitatively different footing’, according to the top court? How does the verdict mark a departure from judicial precedent?